What's new
Cooking Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ideas for Eating on the Cheap

chubbyalaskagriz

New member
A dear friend recently confided in me that they're really hurting financially and that for the next few months she, her hubby and their young son need to try and get by on low, low grocery bills. When I asked about her budget she said that some weeks she wouldn't have much more than $40 or $50 to spend for weekly household groceries- and that includes non-foods, and food for goldfish and a kitty, as well.

I haven't put much thought into this yet for her, but wanted to put the question out there to gather insight from others... I know we've tossed around banter about frugality before, but any more creative thoughts on getting high impact bang for the buck? (The best part is, they have adventurous appetites, are open to meatless meals, and will try almost anything!)
 
So much of this depends on what they keep as staples, Kevin. Given a handful of herbs and spices you can make anything (well, short of Goatsucker's stuff) palatable.

Generally speaking, a frugal diet has to be based on grains and legumes. Two reasons for this: first, they are both inexpensive. And second, if you combine any grain with any bean you produce a complete protein.

Next, if they don't know this already, they should take a tip from Asian cuisines and use animal protein as a flavoring agent rather than as a main component of a dish.

Are they making their own stocks? If not, shame on them. By watching the sales, they can combine a couple of chickens into as many as 20 meals so long as several of them are soup and stew based.

Speaking of which, poor people have always known the benefits of stone soup. Give them a recipe for it if they don't already have one.
 
I think soup is a great way to go. It's nutritious homey and satisfying. You can use all your bits and bobs at the end of the week so that nothing goes to waste. I hope that your friends are shopping at places like Aldi? That will help them tremendously. Anohter thing to cut costly meat from their diet would be to use more eggs. They are alot cheaper than beef and I think healthier too as long as they aren't eating more than one or two per person. You can add a fried egg on top your rice and beans for an even more filling meal. Also if they have a nice store of spices already you might suggest Indian food to them. Indian food makes tremendous use of some of the most inexpensive ingredients. My husband LOVES potato and pea curry. It's one of the vegetarian meals that he will very happily eat and no meat is required.
 
I agree, I think Aldi is a really Good way to go for rice, frozen fish, pizza, can goods, etc.. I have always liked Lima beans with some parmesan cheese & margarine it's a meal for me.

I think p.b. & jam with bread is always a good thing to have in the home, for a quickie. Pasta dishes are always economical, you can always add some frozen veggies to pasta for a perfect dish. Cookie :)
 
I remember hard times and surviving on rice, beans, pasta, potatoes and mac&cheese when you could get 5 boxes for a dollar. Canned vegetables, store brands are not the greatest quality but are very affordable. Planting a garden and growing fresh vegetables is also the way to go this time of year.In a few months 10.00 worth of seeds will provide vegetables galore. Beef and chicken stocks are very affordable and can be added to the rice or pasta and as a gravy for less than using actual meat. A pint sized container of beef or chicken stock at a warehouse type store sells for about 5.00 and flavors over twenty cups of liquid.

Maybe Sandra Lee can pipe in with her 2 cents. But frugal isn't eating cheap. It's just not wasting.
 
Wow $40.. to $50.00 a week is hard when you have got to buy milk, bread, eggs, butter, kitty food, (I will not include goldfish food as it lasts a long time and won't need to be purchased weekly)and all your other needed items like soap, etc....

First they have got to take a calculator with them to shop and add up all purchases. not forgetting to incl. tax. Then you have to stop shopping when you hit the alotted dollar mark. Make a weekly menu to determine just exactly what they need to make each meal, planning is essential. Plan carefully and thoughtfully and they can and will do it!

These are some purchases I would make but first remember to buy ALL STORE BRAND OR CHEAPEST ITEMS THEY OFFER. Get items that stretch the furthest. As everyone mentioned dry beans, canned Salmon (for Salmon Croquets) rice, Mac-n-cheese mix, cheese for some grilled cheese sandwiches. Ask them to make themselves stick to this min-set for however long and before you know it they will be doing it automatically...like Brook mentioned use chicken, beef and pork sparingly and for more than one meal. Stir-fry is a little meat, alot of rice and a few frozen veggies from a bag of frozen veggies> use some sesame oil and soy sauce and it will taste just like the restaurant type! I do not know if your friends have kids or not but pancakes w/ syrup are wonderful and very cheap for breakfast or french toast, leave the expensive non-filling cereal on the shelf it is way over priced.

Quit using paper towels and return to using dish towels. Buy plain old Scott's toilet paper a roll lasts 4 times longer than those expensive brands! Buy bar soap not the liquid stuff. Buy toothpastes like Pepsodent or Ultra Brite it cost $1.00 vs. 2 to 3 dollars a tube.

I believe they can do it if they use the ole' noodle and really try hard. They will not starve, they may not be able to have every last thing they want but they should be able to have what they really need! And tell them to revel in their ability to stick to a plan, be happy about it and keep a can-do attitude! It will not be easy, but hopefully it will not be impossible.

If they have lots of family or friends close by see if they can get to eat at their houses more often!!!:D That'll save a bundle!
 
Thanks to ALL for the bounty of fantastic ideas. You all came up w/ many things I hadn't yet thought of! I think Cathy's right- armed w/ a little know-how and a lotta good attitude, they'll stay well-fed and chipper!
 
Kevin, 40.00-50.00 a week in this day and time is an impossibility when you figure in all things required to operate a household. Specially for 3 people. Just items for a child would top that with what prices are today. God forbid they have an emergency, like the car breaks down or even the need to replace a tire. An illness and a doctors visit could wipe them out.
If I were you I would give the names of these people to my church, or any other organization that helps those that are struggling. Food pantries are there to help. Most food pantries carry the staples needed to survive. The people that really need assistance are not the type to ask for help.
 
My friend has taken temporary leave from her job to take some classes this Summer, which is cutting their income in half for these months. The hints and recommendations are great and will be helpful to them. I think I might actually put some feelers out there regarding the things IC mentions too... THANKS!
 
"to buy ALL STORE BRAND OR CHEAPEST ITEMS THEY OFFER"

Sorry to disagree, Cathy, but one of the two biggest myths of food shopping is that house brands are cheaper.

Putting aside questions of quality (and yes, Virginia, there are differences), if you compare price per volume or weight than house brands often are more expensive.

For instance, a name brand is selling for $1.48. The "same" product in a house brand is only $1.35. Sounds like a deal. But it turns out the name brand is 15 ounces and the house brand only 12.5---which actually makes the house brand (with the likelihood of it being lower quality) a penny an ounce more expensive.

So, rather than automatically reaching for the store brand, or the stuff that's identified as being on sale, the trick is to only compare cost per ounce, in order to level the playing field.

And in all due respect to those who favor the idea, the fact is there is no convenience product sold as cheaply as you can make the same thing yourself.

The most important aspect of living frugally (and this might be a problem for your friends, Kevin, being as she's going back to school) is a willingness to exchange time for money. It certainly takes longer to make mac & cheese from scratch than it does to add water to a box of chemicals.
 
Let me amend the "convenience products are always more expensive" comment to say a lot depends on the definition of "convenience."

The most dramatic instance is milk. When you buy "fresh" milk you are paying to transport somebody else's liquid. Water is both bulky, and weighs 8 pounds per gallon---making it relatively expensive to ship.

What this means is that instant powdered milk actually is a better buy.

There are probably a very few other examples. But, in general, I stand by my statement.
 
"to buy ALL STORE BRAND OR CHEAPEST ITEMS THEY OFFER"

Sorry to disagree, Cathy, but one of the two biggest myths of food shopping is that house brands are cheaper.

Putting aside questions of quality (and yes, Virginia, there are differences), if you compare price per volume or weight than house brands often are more expensive.

For instance, a name brand is selling for $1.48. The "same" product in a house brand is only $1.35. Sounds like a deal. But it turns out the name brand is 15 ounces and the house brand only 12.5---which actually makes the house brand (with the likelihood of it being lower quality) a penny an ounce more expensive.

So, rather than automatically reaching for the store brand, or the stuff that's identified as being on sale, the trick is to only compare cost per ounce, in order to level the playing field.

You make a good point there Brook! I guess I naturally assume everyone knows these differences and will read the label as carefully as I do to make sure I am getting the same exact amount, type and hopefully as good a quality as the more expensive brand name products.

I learned a long time ago that for instance: oatmeal packaged by Quaker Oatmeal the most expensive brand, was also packaged at the same plant, the same product but produced for a store brand at a more affordable price to the consumer & is in almost every respect the same product, just a wee bit cheaper because it was wrapped in a different label. I of-course use common sence and the taste test (try a product 1st before I purchase more). But you can & will save if you are aware and read the labels. I know because I do this even to this day, a name brand label does not fool me!
 
The same with canned goods. You can buy store brand canned veggies at better bargains than name brands. Shop Rite is the mega grocery store here and I know that their brand prices are less. They also have their own packing plant not to far from here so I would think that if you go by the transporting liquid theory, their prices should be less.
I also know that the store brand peanut butter is less than say Jiff, Skippy or Peter Pan peanut butters. The quality isn't as good though. And before anyone mentions volume verses price, This store brand beats the name brands by several ounces.
Store brand pasta, if one looks for sales they can get name brands at good deals but in general, the store brand sells for less. It' again is a poorer quality but, a pound of pasta is a pound of pasta.
Canned kids meals like Spaghetti Os or Chef Boy R Dee. The store brands are always less by about 10-15 cents a can. The same with soups. Until they come out with a new way to mess with can sizes as they have done with plastic containers, most cans usually hold the same amount. Maybe more liquid will go into a can than product but I haven't noticed that yet either.
Breads a big store brand item. It's always cheaper. If I do purchase a loaf of bread, I would rather pay 2.00 a loaf instead of 4.00 to spread my cheap peanut butter on.

KY, I believe that some items are conceiving with store brand labels but all in all, I think Mega Stores use their own items as leaders to get you into the store. Many store brand items are even packed and shipped in from the plants of the name brand companies.
 
"Until they come out with a new way to mess with can sizes as they have done with plastic containers, most cans usually hold the same amount."

Not so, IC. The net weight content of canned goods is all over the map.

A #2 1/2 sized can, which used to contain 16 ounces, has gone steadily downwards since the '70s when the canning industry universally dropped the standard to 15 ounces as a way around price controls. Nowadays, in the same size can, you'll find contents ranging from 12 to 15 ounces. And the unknown question is, how muc of that net-weight is water rather than product? You'd have to do a series of weighing experiments to find out, because the canning industry ain't talking. Having done such experiements, however, I'll give you a hint: the water/product ratio has improved in water's favor.

"The quality isn't as good though....It' again is a poorer quality but, a pound of pasta is a pound of pasta."

As to quality, everyone has to make their own decisions on this. But if you read labels, and see the nutritional differences between one brand and another, it has to impact your choice.

This, however, gets us into the difference between price and value.

"Many store brand items are even packed and shipped in from the plants of the name brand companies."

Absolutely! And the inference has always been that it's therefore the same product with a different label, which is most emphatically not the case. The store brand is put up on a contract packaging basis, and, more often than not, uses a lower grade of the product. If you think not, go buy a can of any house brand of green peas and one of a major brand. Pour each of them into a bowl, and look at the differences.

The question becomes, are those quality (and nutritional and taste) differences worth the difference in price? Obviously, they are to you. Others might not think so. Which again gets us into value versus price.
 
Last edited:
"Absolutely! And the inference has always been that it's therefore the same product with a different label, which is most emphatically not the case. The store brand is put up on a contract packaging basis, and, more often than not, uses a lower grade of the product. If you think not, go buy a can of any house brand of green peas and one of a major brand. Pour each of them into a bowl, and look at the differences."

I was going to mention that name brand products are probably remnants swept from the floor and scraps not to the standards of the name brand product, lol.
I lol but sometimes I think it's a fact.

The better the product, the higher the cost. Of course a can of cheap corn or green beans will cost less than a can of Green Giant or other name brand product. The difference in quality and nutritional value and the chemicals in the cans are going to be different too. Nothing is free and everyone is out for a buck.

"The question becomes, are those quality (and nutritional and taste) differences worth the difference in price? Obviously, they are to you. Others might not think so. Which again gets us into value versus price."

I do not think that giving up quality is worth the difference in price.
When one has a limited budget they must do what needs to be done to make ends meet. If one has the money to go to a high scale deli and bakery for excellent quality cold cuts, cheeses and breads then that's their prerogative. If someone must live on a very small budget, sacrifices must be made. Nutritional values, and quality are going to take the hit.
 
[COLOR="Indigo]
When one has a limited budget they must do what needs to be done to make ends meet. If one has the money to go to a high scale deli and bakery for excellent quality cold cuts, cheeses and breads then that's their prerogative. If someone must live on a very small budget, sacrifices must be made. Nutritional values, and quality are going to take the hit. [/COLOR]


That is exactly on track, we sometimes have no choice. I can make the less attractive product more platible though with just a little extra care in preparation:) I love a challenge;)
 
"Nutritional values, and quality are going to take the hit. "

My whole point is that they don't have to---not unless, like Ms Lee, you insist on making convenience the priority.

Here's an example of her style versus mine:

Sandra Lee's style: You buy a package of those Crock Pot Classics in the frozen food section. Throw it in a slow cooker and add some wine, instead of water, "to make it seem homemade."

My style: (Putting aside the fact I don't use slow cookers). You buy some meat and veggies. Add appropriate herbs & spices. Pour in a little wine. Cook until done.

In addition to being better tasting and healthier, mine is exponentially less expensive than hers. But with mine you have to invest some time. With hers you invest dollars.

Another example of the difference. Have you seen those commercially where a chain of gas station/convenient stores is pushing their coffee over coffee shop coffee as a money saving step. Why, the commercial asks, pay 4 bucks for a cup of coffee when ours is just as good for 99 cents?

I would suggest there is no way that 99 cent coffee is just as good as 4 dollar coffee. I also think than anyone who drops four bucks on a paper cup filled with badly brewed coffee and hot milk is a fool. But the real point is, if money is a concern, you can buy a lot of coffee grounds for 99 cents and brew your own. That way you'll reduce your daily coffee fix from $4 to about a dime.

"I was going to mention that name brand [I'm sure you meant house brand here] products are probably remnants swept from the floor and scraps not to the standards of the name brand product, lol.
I lol but sometimes I think it's a fact."

I guess it could seem that way. I don't buy enough canned goods to have a feel for it (I prefer frozen for many reasons). But what many people fail to realize is that produce for human consumption is graded, just like meat. Name brands use the equivalent of prime grade. House brands use the equivalent of unrolled.

Going back to the green pea example. The name brand will all be of a size. They will be plumb and smooth skinned. Color will be deep, rich, and appealing. They will all meet certain nutritional criteria, and fit into an industry standard brix scale. Etc.

The house brand will be different sizes. Some will be broken or crushed. There will be a diversity of visual appeal, with many of them wrinkled, shrunken, etc. Color will often be off. In short, they will look, as you say, as if they were the sweepings off the factory floor. And they will meet the minimum standards for human consumption as set by the government and industry. And, compared to the name brand, they will often taste bad (has to do with their brix number, you see).

Now then, if its a case where the name brand is say, $2 and the house brand a buck, I might consider the house brand for some applications. But if, as is often the case, there's only a few cents difference between the two, then I'll opt for the name brand everytime, as I'd rather pay a few pennies more for the increased quality.

Question: Have you, or has anyone, done a comparison between canned goods and frozen in terms of price? As I said, I rarely use canned goods, because frozen is such better quality. But I wonder if there's a cost difference as well.
 
"That is exactly on track, we sometimes have no choice."

You always have other options, Cathy. You just have to be aware of them, and choose what makes the most sense for you.
 
I like frozen veggies better than can veggies except for veg-all, I like that one. I think you do get more veggies frozen it's more economical and you can freeze the other half. I do buy "store bought brands" it does help me save some money & I can shop any where & save when I buy the store brands.

I go to thrift stores to for snacks & stuff. Cookie :)
 
Back
Top